tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2356521771899662194.post4234597426366197683..comments2023-10-29T03:19:52.346-05:00Comments on The New Orleans Secular Humanist Assoc. Blog: The Bible and Sex....a non-theist reviewNOSHAhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02423636756548589951noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2356521771899662194.post-36890372316920525212013-10-01T13:28:06.242-05:002013-10-01T13:28:06.242-05:00Thanks a lot Jim Dugan for this beautiful post.it&...Thanks a lot Jim Dugan for this beautiful post.it's based on The Bible and Sex.it's a knowledgeable & informative post & i've got more information to read this post.<br />Visit : http://marquezvsbradleyfight.net/ & get more entertainment.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16935130450035444588noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2356521771899662194.post-57973040251939178062013-05-31T11:05:03.669-05:002013-05-31T11:05:03.669-05:00"The Bible is supposed at least to be divinel..."The Bible is supposed at least to be divinely inspired, and for more fundamentalist believers to be a perfect revelation of divine will, yet interpretations of that inspired or revealed word vary tremendously. Moreover, that variation in interpretation is not just something we find among ordinary churchgoers; it is endemic to the high-powered biblical scholars who influence, and maybe even guide, rank-and-file opinion."<br /><br />You seem to be making the point that Christians can't agree with each other over their own Holy Book even though it is supposedly revealed or inspired.<br /><br />Stephen D. Moore, for example, is an atheist. He doesn't beleive the Bible is inspired at all; he doesn't beleive in God. You are framing the 2013 Greer-Heard forum as an intra-church argument.<br /><br />Is it really? The speakers don't hold to the same standard of biblical inspiration, to say the least. Seth Dunnhttp://www.sethdunn.comnoreply@blogger.com